The tech industry came for Steam and whiffed so hard that it’s had to admit that it didn’t even really like making games in the first place

Amazon’s Foray into MMOs: A Stumble, Not a Sunset, for New World’s Potential

The gaming industry is a dynamic and often brutal arena, where ambitious projects can ascend to stratospheric heights or vanish into the digital ether with disheartening speed. In recent years, the concept of the Massively Multiplayer Online (MMO) genre has been a particularly tempting, yet elusive, prize for titans of technology seeking to diversify their portfolios. Amazon, a behemoth synonymous with e-commerce and cloud computing, made a significant splash with its ambitious entry into this space, the much-anticipated New World. However, the narrative surrounding its performance, and indeed Amazon’s broader commitment to game development, has been subject to considerable scrutiny. Whispers have circulated that the tech industry, in its pursuit of a share of the lucrative gaming market, may have approached this endeavor with a fundamental misunderstanding, leading to outcomes that suggest a lack of genuine passion for the craft of game creation itself. This analysis delves into the complexities of Amazon’s New World and explores the reasons behind its less-than-stellar trajectory, arguing that its struggles are less a reflection of an inherent flaw in the game’s design and more a symptom of a corporate strategy that perhaps prioritized market entry over deep-seated commitment to the intricate art of MMO development.

The Allure of the MMO Landscape for Tech Giants

The MMO genre represents a unique and enduring segment of the gaming world. Characterized by persistent online worlds, player-driven economies, vast social interactions, and long-term engagement, MMOs possess an inherent stickiness that is highly attractive to companies looking for sustained revenue streams and a deeply engaged user base. Unlike single-player experiences or even competitive multiplayer games with shorter lifecycles, successful MMOs can command subscriptions, in-game purchases, and a loyal community for years, even decades. For a company like Amazon, with its vast resources and established digital infrastructure, the prospect of tapping into this market was undoubtedly compelling. The potential for integrating services, fostering community platforms, and leveraging its existing customer base seemed like a natural extension of its business model. The allure wasn’t just about selling games; it was about building an ecosystem, a digital universe that players would inhabit and contribute to, generating ongoing value.

The technological underpinnings of MMOs also align with the core competencies of major tech firms. Scalable server infrastructure, robust networking, sophisticated data management, and cutting-edge graphics all fall within the purview of companies that operate at the forefront of technological innovation. This made the jump into MMO development seem less like a radical departure and more like an evolutionary step. The promise of a new frontier, a place where their technological prowess could be directly applied to creating immersive entertainment, was a powerful motivator.

New World’s Ambitious Genesis: Expectations vs. Reality

When Amazon Games first unveiled New World, the anticipation was palpable. Pitched as a beautiful, dangerous, and ever-evolving open-world action MMO, it promised a fresh take on familiar fantasy tropes, emphasizing player-driven conflict, crafting, and exploration in the mystical land of Aeternum. The early trailers and gameplay demonstrations showcased stunning visuals, a compelling combat system that eschewed traditional tab-targeting for more action-oriented mechanics, and a focus on player-made settlements and territories. The sheer scale of the undertaking, backed by the financial muscle of Amazon, led many to believe that this would be a serious contender, a title capable of challenging established giants like World of Warcraft or Final Fantasy XIV.

However, the path from announcement to launch was fraught with delays and iterative development cycles. While this is not uncommon in the complex world of MMO development, each postponement fueled speculation and raised the stakes for the eventual release. When New World finally launched, it was met with a mixed reception. While many praised its ambitious scope, beautiful world design, and engaging combat, significant issues quickly came to the fore. These included rampant bugs, server instability, an unbalanced player economy, and a perceived lack of endgame content. The initial player surge, fueled by hype and Prime Gaming benefits, quickly waned as the realities of the game’s technical and design shortcomings became apparent.

The “Whiff” Explained: Misunderstanding the Core of MMO Engagement

The phrase “whiffed so hard” suggests a fundamental miscalculation. In the context of New World and Amazon’s broader gaming ambitions, this “whiff” appears to stem from a misunderstanding of what truly drives sustained engagement and loyalty in the MMO genre. It’s not simply about having impressive graphics or a novel combat system; it’s about fostering a living, breathing world that players feel invested in.

Player Agency and Meaningful Progression: A core element of successful MMOs is the sense that players have genuine agency and that their progression feels meaningful. This means having diverse paths to power, interesting choices in character development, and activities that reward players for their time and effort, not just for their ability to grind. New World’s initial endgame was criticized for being too grind-heavy and lacking variety, leading many players to feel their time was not well spent.

A Thriving, Player-Driven Economy: The economies of MMOs are often as complex and engaging as their combat systems. Players invest heavily in crafting, trading, and resource gathering. For an economy to thrive, it needs careful balancing, opportunities for specialization, and a robust marketplace. New World’s economy was plagued by issues such as inflation, duplication glitches, and an imbalance between resource availability and player demand, which undermined the efforts of many diligent players.

Community and Social Interaction: MMOs are, by definition, social experiences. The ability to form guilds, undertake group content, and engage in meaningful player-to-player interactions is paramount. While New World offered PvP territory control and some cooperative content, it struggled to cultivate the deep, organic community bonds that are the lifeblood of long-standing MMOs. The emphasis on competitive PvP, while appealing to some, sometimes overshadowed the cooperative and social aspects crucial for broader appeal.

Content Cadence and Long-Term Vision: For an MMO to remain relevant, developers must have a clear, long-term vision for content updates and expansions. Players expect a steady stream of new quests, dungeons, raids, and other activities to keep them engaged. New World’s post-launch content roadmap, while eventually showing signs of improvement, was initially seen as lacking the consistent and impactful updates that players of established MMOs have come to expect.

The “whiff” implies that Amazon, perhaps accustomed to the more transactional nature of e-commerce or the rapid iteration of cloud services, underestimated the intricate, nuanced, and deeply player-centric requirements of successful MMO development. It’s a genre that demands not just technological prowess but also a profound understanding of player psychology, community building, and the art of sustained, evolving narrative and gameplay.

The Uncomfortable Admission: “We Didn’t Even Really Like Making Games”

The implication that Amazon “didn’t even really like making games in the first place” is a strong one, but it resonates with the observed outcomes. When a company enters a new market with immense resources but struggles to achieve sustained success, it often points to a disconnect between the corporate objectives and the intrinsic demands of the field.

Strategic Diversification vs. Passionate Creation: For a company like Amazon, the expansion into gaming could be viewed as a strategic diversification, a way to capture a larger share of consumer attention and spending. This is fundamentally different from a studio founded by individuals with a lifelong passion for game development, driven by a desire to create specific types of experiences. When the primary motivation is market penetration rather than a genuine love for the craft, the compromises and challenges inherent in game creation can become more burdensome.

Resource Allocation and Prioritization: While Amazon has vast resources, the allocation of those resources within its gaming division might have been subject to pressures and expectations driven by broader corporate goals. If the MMO development was seen as a means to an end, rather than an end in itself, then the necessary investments in talent, iterative design, and community management might have been perceived as less critical than in a company where gaming is the core identity.

The “Exit Strategy” Mentality: In some instances, large tech companies entering established creative industries can exhibit a sort of “build it and they will come” mentality, coupled with an implicit understanding that if a venture doesn’t rapidly meet certain financial projections, it can be scaled back or divested. This contrasts sharply with the iterative, often years-long development cycles and the deep emotional investment required for true MMO success. The ability to pivot quickly or discontinue a product, while a strength in other Amazon ventures, can be detrimental to the long-term health of an MMO, which relies on player trust and developer commitment.

The narrative around New World’s struggles, and the subsequent scaling back of Amazon’s internal game development ambitions (such as the cancellation of the ambitious Lord of the Rings MMO and the closure of Amazon Game Studios Orange County), lends credence to this idea. It suggests that the initial foray might have been an experiment, a market probe, rather than a deeply committed long-term endeavor. If the primary objective was to test the waters and extract value, and if that value wasn’t immediately apparent or achievable through a standard corporate playbook, then the enthusiasm for continuing the difficult and often unglamorous work of MMO development might have waned considerably.

Why New World Wouldn’t Have to Die: The Unfulfilled Potential

The assertion that New World wouldn’t have to die if Amazon truly wanted to be an MMO developer is a crucial point. The game, despite its flaws, possessed a solid foundation and elements that resonated with players.

A Unique Combat System: New World’s action-oriented combat, which required aiming, dodging, and strategic use of abilities, was a significant departure from the more passive combat found in many traditional MMOs. This system, when polished and balanced, offered a more visceral and engaging player experience.

A Visually Stunning World: Aeternum is a beautifully realized world, with diverse biomes, intricate architecture, and atmospheric lighting. This visual fidelity contributes significantly to player immersion and exploration.

Meaningful Player Interaction (PvP): The territory control system, with its large-scale PvP wars, provided a compelling objective for player guilds and factions. When functioning correctly, these wars offered thrilling strategic and tactical gameplay.

The Power of Iteration and Developer Commitment: The history of MMOs is replete with examples of games that were not perfect at launch but were saved and eventually thrived through consistent developer support, community engagement, and iterative improvements. Games like Final Fantasy XIV are prime examples of titles that were rebuilt and revitalized, earning immense player loyalty through unwavering developer commitment.

Had Amazon approached New World with the same long-term vision and dedication that defines successful MMO studios, its trajectory could have been vastly different. This would have involved:

The fact that New World possesses these foundational strengths, and yet its future appears uncertain, strongly suggests that the issue lies not with the inherent quality of the game’s concept or initial design, but with the commitment and strategic direction of its publisher.

Lessons Learned: The Tech Industry’s Gaming Education

The experience with New World, and the broader struggles of tech giants in breaking into the established MMO market, offer valuable lessons.

The Nuance of Player Engagement: It’s become increasingly clear that player engagement in MMOs is a complex, multi-faceted phenomenon driven by more than just technological novelty or marketing power. It requires a deep understanding of player psychology, social dynamics, and the art of sustained narrative and gameplay.

The Importance of Passion and Culture: Game development, particularly for genres like MMOs, thrives on passion and a specific development culture. Studios that are built around a shared love for gaming, and a commitment to crafting unique player experiences, tend to have a significant advantage. This is difficult to replicate in a corporate environment primarily focused on other industries.

Long-Term Investment is Non-Negotiable: Success in the MMO space is rarely an overnight phenomenon. It requires a sustained, long-term investment in development, content, and community. Companies that are unwilling or unable to commit to this marathon, rather than a sprint, are likely to falter.

The “Why” Matters as Much as the “What”: While Amazon has the “what” in terms of technological capability and financial backing, the “why” – the genuine, intrinsic motivation to excel in game development – appears to have been less present. This distinction is critical. The tech industry’s foray into gaming, while ambitious, may have been more about market expansion and diversification than a deep-seated desire to be storytellers and world-builders in the truest sense. The New World saga serves as a stark reminder that success in any industry, especially one as creative and player-centric as gaming, requires more than just capital and infrastructure; it demands passion, understanding, and an unwavering commitment to the craft.

You also may like 〣〣